home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: engnews1.Eng.Sun.COM!taumet!clamage
- From: mcelroy@ecst.CSUChico.EDU (James Robert McElroy)
- Newsgroups: comp.std.c++
- Subject: Re: Explicit? What's that?
- Date: 21 Feb 1996 22:53:42 GMT
- Organization: California State University, Chico
- Approved: clamage@eng.sun.com (comp.std.c++)
- Message-ID: <4gg7df$76c@charnel.ecst.csuchico.edu>
- References: <4gb00j$2ne@charnel.ecst.csuchico.edu> <4gd4b9$c43@engnews1.Eng.Sun.COM>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: taumet.eng.sun.com
- Content-Type: text
- X-Nntp-Posting-Host: hairball.ecst.csuchico.edu
- Content-Length: 352
- X-Lines: 10
- Originator: clamage@taumet
-
- Hmmm... About two years ago I suggested, in this
- newsgroup, that the "explicit" keyword be used
- by C++. But my suggestion was for use with
- conversion operators rather than constructors.
- If I remember correctly, the majority of people
- thought it was a stupid idea. Interesting...
- --
- Jim McElroy
- Calif. State Univ., Chico
- mcelroy@ecst.csuchico.edu
-
- [ To submit articles: Try just posting with your newsreader.
- If that fails, use mailto:std-c++@ncar.ucar.edu
- FAQ: http://reality.sgi.com/employees/austern_mti/std-c++/faq.html
- Policy: http://reality.sgi.com/employees/austern_mti/std-c++/policy.html
- Comments? mailto:std-c++-request@ncar.ucar.edu
- ]
-